Other than a few Tech fans that can't see past the end of their nose, it seems like pretty much everyone agrees that Sorbsy playing would be terrible for the sport.

Has there ever been anything similar in CFB history that has united fans on one particular side of an argument?

Not to say that they would absolutely rule in his favor, but it's wild to see all everyone overseeing this case as a connection to Tech.

Not a troll post. With today's court injunction in favor of Brendan Sorsby, it appears even the most fundamental, universally agreed-upon rules of the game no longer matter. So with millions of dollars on the line for players and Athletic Departments, what's keeping this from sliding into lawsuits about basic rules, on-the-field calls, and the outcomes of games?

For example, many if not most targeting ejections are highly disputable. A player who gets called for targeting in the second half of a game so he can't play in the first half of the next game should, at this point, file for an emergency injunction in the week between games to get the rule overturned. Given that rules don't matter anymore, why not?

This sucks. It truly does. But is this the direction we're heading?

They operate as an LLC with their own Board of Managers. Can they not simply act on their own behalf to exclude Tech unless they drop Sorsby? Per their own ruling based on this singular case? Is there anything binding them to including every FBS team no matter what? They already determine what champions and what at-large teams appear.

We’ve already seen basketball players on G-League or even fully on NBA teams comeback and gain eligibility to play for NCAA teams. Are we gonna see UDFA or practice roster players all of a sudden gonna start signing back to college teams?