Back in the days of lockdown and after, ESL had a nice line in kind of fun memorable tunes they rolled out between maps. Yes ok maybe it got repetitive, but it was fun and we loved to drop SERA 😭 in the chat.
That was all stock music, they paid a company for it to use royalty free. Thing is that company paid real human producers and musicians to make it. People heard music, composers made a living. Nice.
Fast forward 6 years. Now half or more of what we are getting is genuinely AI slop - in case you didn't know. It's made by someone logging into sites and just pressing a few buttons. Trained off that same music, but stolen. AI-washed music is flooding streaming.
Those musicians? Probably have to get new jobs, or just make AI slop themselves. Do you care? maybe you don't make music, but you knew someone who did. Or maybe you just liked the idea that humans can do something creative for a living.
If you ask me we've all been let down by the biggest industrialized IP heist in history, and the governments across the world have sat by and let in happen in the name of profit. If Mozart were born now, he would be a nobody, because his genius would mean almost nothing and be lost in a sea of slop.
I honestly weep for our humanity and the death of our creative soul.
But that's just me. How do you feel about AI slop and the death of human creativity?
EDIT =====
This is not a post about the music quality or style. It is about human creativity.
Because some you are doubting me, just to clarify they just played this "Just So You Know" - by Matthew Magenta. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItDo9bbWNoQ - Description says its from artlist.io a well known AI slop factory. Its not a bad track, but clearly AI is used.
EDIT 2 ====
In the new world of AI gen assets, provenance is always going to hard if not impossible to prove. That is why I mentioned governments failing us. The site itself is heavily pushing AI alongside stock music. It would be v hard to prove either way now, but I feel like I followed a reasonable process. I find it absurd that what is presumeably a younger audience (not sure though) is attacking me for pointing out that a future where they/you could actually earn a living from anything creative, is being stolen from them/you, right in front of their eyes - and yet somehow I'm the bad guy here.
EDIT 3 ====
ESL have replied to say they do not deliberately use AI music. That is great to hear! I've taken an absolute beating in the comments from you guys, mainly for not being 100% sure myself if the track is AI. This is a great sign! It can only mean you also don't want AI music, and that, after all, was the point of my post, to find out how you felt.
But ESL also state they cannot be 100% sure. The track does link to a well known AI music gen site as you can see for yourself. Yes it has stock music, but it clearly is pushing gen AI music, and other commenters note the stock music could potentially contain AI.
Despite the crowd harping "due diligence" to me, I want to remind you it's not my job to do the due diligence, it's ESLs. My conclusion was pretty reasonable given the track does link to this AI music site. And that a large number of tracks are not showing any provenance on "Now Playing".
But I regret saying "half of the music" in my titles, this was an exaggeration and I apologise. I personally like the music being played, but think the onus is on the streaming company to do due dilegence, not me.
The best thing to come out of this thread was NIGHTMODER - maker of the excellent music kit - replied to offer their tunes to ESL "all our music is pre-cleared on all platforms and made by real touring artists that people actually listen to." - this is the way to do due dilegence! Use labels with genuine human artists. Thank you to ESL for saying they will look into this approach! I really hope you do. And thank you genuinely for surfacing some great tracks over the years.
Despite the exaggeration in my post, for which I again apologise, I'm super happy to see that it may lead to further human creative output being used and rewarded in the CS scene, and that it has shone a light on just how unpopular a reliance on AI music seemingly would be (otherwise, like I say, why would so many be asking for the evidence, if you didn't care).